59(1), 138–159 (2012)īecker, J., Knackstedt, R., Pöppelbuβ, J.: Developing maturity models for IT management: a procedure model and its application. Maier, A., Moultrie, J., Clarkson, P.: Assessing organizational capabilities: reviewing and guiding the development of maturity grids. Gallen: Institute of Information Management, University of St. Mettler, T.: A design science research perspective on maturity models in information systems. In: Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Information Systems, Helsinki, Finland, June 2011 Röglinger, M., Pöppelbuß, J.: What makes a useful maturity model? A framework for general design principles for maturity models and its demonstration in business process management. The Open Group: Archimate 3.0.1 Specification (2017).
In: 20th IEEE Conference on Business Informatics (CBI 2018), Vienna, Austria (2018) Proença, D., Borbinha, J.: Maturity model architect - a tool for maturity assessment support. thesis, Department of Theoretical Computer Science and Mathematical Logic, Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University (2009)īaader, F., Horrocks, I., Sattler, U.: Description Logics (2007). Vaculin, R.: Process mediation framework for semantic web services. Cambridge University Press, New York (2003) In: Proceedings of the First International Conference (FIOS 1998), Trento, Italy, 6–8 June 1998īaader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuiness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications, 1st edn. Guarino, N.: Formal onthology in information systems. Uschold, M., Gruninger, M.: Ontologies: principles, methods and applications. thesis, University of Twenty, Enschede (1997) Acquisition 5, 199–220 (1993)īorst, W.N.: Construction of engineering ontologies.
#Creation workshop export to mms portable#
Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. In: Proceedings of IJCAI-99 Workshop on Ontologies and Problem Solving Methods (KRR5), Stockholm, Sweden (1999) Gomez-Perez, A., Benjamins, R.: Overview of knowledge sharing and reuse components: ontologies and problem-solving methods.
#Creation workshop export to mms software#
Software Engineering Institute - Carnegie Mellon University, Technical report, CMU/SEI-2010-TR-033 (2010)īreitman, K., Casanova, M.A., Truszkowski, W.: Semantic Web: Concepts, Technologies and Applications. In: The 33rd ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC 2018), Pau, France (2018)ĬMMI Product Team: CMMI for development, version 1.3. Proença, D., Borbinha, J.: Using enterprise architecture model analysis and description logics for maturity assessment. In: 19th IEEE Conference on Business Informatics, Thessaloniki, Greece (2017) Proença, D., Borbinha, J.: Enterprise architecture: a maturity model based on TOGAF ADM. Accessed Jan 2015Īntunes, G.: Analysis of enterprise architecture models: an application of ontologies to the enterprise architecture domain. World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation (2012). W3C: OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Structural Specification and Functional-Style Syntax, 2nd edn. Genesereth, M.R., Nilsson, N.J.: Logical Foundations of Artificial Intelligence. Guarino, N., Oberle, D., Staab, S.: What is an ontology? In: Staab, S., Studer, R. Studer, R., Benjamins, R., Fensel, D.: Knowledge engineering: principles and methods. International Organization for Standardization and International Electrotechnical Commission Std.
ISO/IEC 15504:2004: Information technology - Process assessment. Addison Wesley Professional, Boston (2008) ACM 16, 399–405 (1973)Īhern, D.M., Clouse, A., Turner, R.: CMMI Destilled: A Pratical Introduction to Integrated Process Improvement, 3rd edn. Nolan, R.L.: Managing the computer resource: a stage hypothesis. Assuming that the wide spread of Enterprise Architecture practices is making the modeling of business domains a fact, and considering the recent state of the art on the representation of those models as ontologies, this paper proposes how existing semantic technology can be used to automate TOGAF ADM maturity assessment of organizations by automating the analysis of enterprise architecture models in ArchiMate.
In addition, many times the lack of automation renders benchmarks not possible. A main caveat of these assessments is the resources they encompass. Doing maturity assessments can range from simple self-assessment questionnaires to full-blown assessment methods, such as those recommended by the ISO/IEC TS 33030 or the SEI SCAMPI. A maturity assessment can enable stakeholders to clearly identify strengths and improvement points, and prioritize actions in order to reach higher maturity levels. It is therefore a widely used technique valuable to assess certain aspects of organizations, as for example business processes. A Maturity Model represents a path towards an increasingly organized and systematic way of doing business.
0 kommentar(er)
